LONG BEACH, Calif — The Supreme Court of the United States, a conservative majority bench, earlier this fall voted six to three in a ruling to allow federal immigration officers to continue what they call “roving patrol” operations in Los Angeles and cities within.
Many call the decision un-American, saying that it is wrong and unconstitutional to assume and just arrest or question people simply because of their appearance or status. Based on the language they speak, their race, or their occupation.
Long Beach State professor and immigration activist Teresa Puente about her thoughts on the ruling. She described it as a clear example of racial profiling.
“What I think the Supreme Court and what ICE are doing is essentially racial profiling,” Puente said. “I think inherently it’s not fair because to assume something about a person because of their skin color, the language they speak, or their occupation is just inherently un-American.”
However, supporters of the SCOTUS decision argue that allowing federal immigration officers to continue operation helps uphold the constitution of the United States. One of them included Frank Ryan, the owner of BeachIn in Seal Beach, a store fully dedicated to President Trump selling hats, mugs, t-shirts, and more.
“I think it’s a blessing that the Supreme Court allowed it to continue. I don’t believe a state should try to overthrow the federal government or create its own laws. The Supreme Court’s role is to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States.” Said Ryan
As debates over the ruling continue, both community members and leaders locally and nationwide are responding in many ways. The long-term impact of the decision remains unclear.
